After reading reviews of some other brands and the installation problems encountered, I was almost reluctant to buy any router as I am not all that tech-savy. However, I wanted to replace my Spectrum-supplied router and stop paying monthly rent forever. I found that TP-Link's installation instructions were simple, clear, and best of all, they worked. Getting the router up and running was no problem and I soon was having internet service on two towers and two iPads. The only real problems I encountered were with trying to get my Roku box and Ring doorbell connected to the internet. The problem was my wi-fi password. HELPFUL HINT: when you set up the new wi-fi site, you will need to create a password, as you don't just automatically use your old site. When creating your password, use only letters and numbers, NO special characters like ##, etc. For some reason Roku and Ring, did not recognize the password. I contacted Ring for help, Ring finally passed me off to TP-Link and Walter, a very patient and helpful rep led me through all sorts of steps, and finally mentioned the password problem. I changed the wi-fi password to only letters (Caps are OK) and numbers and had no more problems and got Ring and Roku up on internet in no time. This problem may happen with some other apps; don't take that chance. Letters and numbers only. I should mention, there was no attempt to get me to buy into a multi-year security program like some people have complained about some other brands. I'm not sure, but I think this router is faster than the Spectrum router; that may be my wishful thinking. At the worst, it is just as fast as the Spectrum router, which is plenty fast for me. This router has good range and covers my whole house. I am very happy with my new router and highly recommend it. Read more
So far, delivering what the industry and user reviews have promised: bandwidth, quality, easy set-up and all at a very friendly price. Nicely packaged and the set-up instruction guide is easy to follow. Significantly better coverage in our 2000 ftยฒ condo than our previous Linksys router -- and now no dead zones. The only glitch so far was getting my external USB NAS drive to be properly recognized and all the files accessible thru the router (which had been accessible just fine on my previous nearly 10-year old router). A couple days back-and-forth with helpful folks inside the TP-Link Community got the Windows 11 SMB settings sorted and we are now "good to go". Update after 5 weeks: still highly recommended. Delivering solid, stable performance and all the bandwidth we can expect from our Xfinity cable internet service. Read more
This router works great. Easy setup took me less than 10min to have everything set up and running managing the router is not complicated. Everything is straight forward. The range is decent. You can have it running Wi-Fi 6 or you can set it up with dual band . Read more
Seems to work well. I bought this to replace an older "n" travel router I had and I wanted to modernize to newer wifi standards. Haven't used it in a hotel yet but I connected it to my home wifi and then connected my laptop to this unit's wifi. My home internet is gigabit and I can typically get about 800 mbps with the wifi (home router is also a newer wifi 7 router). Through this, I got about 500 mbps, so not as fast but still very reasonable and much faster than my old "n" travel router. I am disappointed that it's not tri-band though. Read more
This was a very easy process to set up and a great device. I recommend that you use the mobile app to set up the device. My internet speed has never been better than before I got the router. I have issues with connectivity in rooms far from my modem, to the point that I was using a wifi extender in one room. I got this router, and I no longer have to do that. I get double the speed that I did without this router. This router is very sturdy. Read more
TLDR: I think Tom's Hardware Guide said it best "Bringing Wi-Fi 7 to the masses... The TP-Link Archer BE3600 is cheap, but you also donโt get the full spec of features or performance of โtrueโ Wi-Fi 7 routers". If youโre not big into gaming and just want a no-frills router to support your 1 Gbps or lower internet connection, thereโs nothing wrong with the Archer BE3600. I personally, am very happy with my purchase and it's probably the best solution for 85% of people out there/ non-enthusiasts. NOTE: I paid $83 for this Wifi router using an Amazon coupon. Which I think is a very fair price for something I only plan to upgrade every 5-7 years, and only if I have to. I also live in a townhouse, so it's not like the signal has to go 60+ft. Details: Upgrading from a TPLINK AC1750 (Archer A7) [release ~2018], using Comcast internet (Fast plan; up to 600 mbps down) and a Netgear AC1200 WiFi USB Adapter 802.11ac Dual Band, USB 3.0 (on my computer but in a USB 2.0 port) which was about 7 feet away from the wireless router and I saw a measurable increase in my download speeds (~45% from ~260mbps to ~380 mbps using Ookla speed test). Purportedly the TP-Link BE3600 which was released in the 2024/2025 timeframe uses the same frequency bands (5 GHz and 2.4 GHz bands) as the older TPLINK AC1750 (Archer A7), but uses the newer and faster WIFI 7 (802.11be) vs the older WIFI 5 (802.11ac) protocols. The TP-Link BE3600 advertises up to 3.57 Gbps (aka 3570 Mbps; 2882 Mbps in 5 GHz band + 688 Mbps in 2.4 GHz band) whereas the Archer A7 only 1.75 Gbps (1300 Mbps in 5GHz + 450 Mbps in 2.4 GHz bands). Practically speaking the internet says anything above 100 Mbps should be able to run multiple devices pretty well streaming. But I'm upgrading anyway, because my mother needs a new router so she doesn't have to pay $10/mo for one from the cable company. I have no complaints. Easy to setup and connect to. I realize I'm now probably being gated by my older Netgear AC1200 WiFi USB Adapter which is using a USB 2.0 port (max speed 480 mbps) but my speeds are enough for me; my newer gaming PC which sits about 10 ft away from the router and uses a built-in WIFI card (Wi-Fi 6E 802.11ax) manages ~500 mbps down. CAVEAT: I do want to note my older Netis WF2120 Wireless N150 Nano USB Dongle 802.11 b/g/n (aka WIFI 1/3/4) on an older computer was not able to see the 2.4 GHz signal from the BE3600 whereas it could from the AC1750; so I replaced it. I ended up using a spare Wavlink 600M dual-band connectivity (2.4GHz and 5GHz) USB WiFi adapter which uses 802.11ac WIFI 5; and had to update the drivers on my older windows PC in the process (to recognize the Wavlink adapter). Read more
