A D Medical Multi-User Blood Pressure Monitor for Home Use UA-767FAC Wide Range Cuff 8 6-16 5 22-42cm

Works very well. Took it to doctor's office and tested it against doctor's blood pressure equipment. It's right on target. Has made monitoring my blood pressure so easy. Read more

Excellent bp monitor. This is by far the most user friendly bp monitor I have ever used. First, the cuff covers a wide range of sizes - well beyond the typical ones. I found this particular brand by looking up bp monitors for people with small arms as the typical is cuff is too large for me to get an accurate reading. Additionally, the cuff has pictures on it that tell you exactly how to position it and where to place your arm. This is a great device to have at home to monitor one's blood pressure, especially if you have "white coat syndrome" like I do. My blood pressure is often elevated in the doctor's office, but always normal at home. Now I can check my blood pressure regularly and feel confident I am doing it correctly by following the guide and having an appropriately sized cuff. Read more

This BP monitor is accurate and made well very nice easy to use cuff. I tested (8) and this was the best including units for $100 My daily go to you wont be displeased Read more

Buying a blood pressure monitor turned out to be a lot more complicated than I expected. I ended up buying three models before deciding which one was right for me. The ones I purchased were: - Omron 10 (BP786N) - Withings Wireless Blood Pressure Monitor - A&D UA-767F I initially purchased the Omron, but it had inaccurate diastolic readings, so I purchased the Withings. However although the Withings was very accurate, it had other issues, so I purchased the A&D, but it had inaccurate systolic readings and a cuff I disliked, so I returned it and decided to keep the Withings. However the Withings stopped working on the 27th day. It resumed working the next day, but I no longer trusted it, so I returned it and am using a replacement Omron 10 in its place. I tested these blood pressure monitors rigorously, being careful to use proper techniques and recording all results in a spreadsheet. I was impressed that the Withings had the most consistent and I believe accurate results. I did not have the opportunity to take it to my doctor’s office, but I tested against five other home monitors: my old Omron 3, which has been regularly validated at my doctor’s office, a LifeSource ( A&D) UA-767 at the Kaiser Permanente Education Office in San Rafael, CA, two Omron 10’s, and the A&D I returned. Compared with the Omron and Withings, this A&D BPM is basic and no-fills, but impressive. It’s also the cheapest, selling (as of February 2017) for $15 less than the Omron and $50 less than the Withings. It doesn’t pretend to have Bluetooth connectivity. It’s what I wanted originally, but after my problems with the Omron and Withings, I decided that Bluetooth for Android BPM’s is more of a hassle at present than it’s worth. Its accuracy would have been on a par with the Withings and maybe a little better if it hadn't been for a defect that caused it occasionally to report systolic readings that were at least 10 points too low. I tested it repeatedly, trying to eliminate the possibility that I was doing something incorrectly (I’ve been measuring my blood pressure every day for six years, so I have experience at it). I finally reluctantly decided to return it. Before deciding to return it, I tried contacting A&D several times about the systolic errors, but the contact form on the A&D website always crashed, giving me an SQL syntax error. Its data averaging is not as automatic as the others, but is more flexible. The Omron and Withings allow you to average three measurements. It’s totally automatic, You press the button and it does three readings. The A&D requires that you manually start each reading and to time the interval between readings yourself. However the advantage is that you can average as many readings as you want, up to 60. It averages all readings in memory, so if you want to average only the current ones, you need to delete all previous readings from memory. If you record your readings ina spreadsheet like I do, this is not a problem. One things I strongly disliked about the A&D is the cuff. The Omron and WIthings cuffs are superior. The A&D is very long andt I found more difficult to use than any of the cuffs on the two previous blood pressure monitors that I’ve owned as well as the Omron and Withings. If I ever buy the A&D, I’ll buy a medium cuff for it (approximately $20). One other thing I like about the A&D: it’s the only one of the three monitors that had all the information I needed to know contained in a single manual, which was included both in printed form with the manual and available for download. The A&D is the only one that comes with a carrying case. It seemed to be pretty decent quality. Overall the A&D impressed me. If the one I bought did not have a defect that causes random systolic reading errors, I’d have kept it and ordered a different cuff. Read more

I had never used this type of blood pressure monitor before, but after using it, I found it very good and satisfactory. Read more

I'd used a discontinued Omron model for more than ten years and began getting repeated "error" failures. I found the reviews of several alternatives on Amazon confusing. After consulting some other sources, I decided to try the A&D UA-767, knowing that, if it proved unsatisfactory, I could return it. It's been working well for me. Yes, the medical office-style cuff, with its wide range of adjustment, takes a little more effort to secure than the one-size-fits-all cuff on my old Omron monitor but that's a minor issue. One caution: If you want to use the AC, plug-in power source, you need to order the AC model, not the F model, whcih requires the AC power source to be purchased separately. Read more

This is easy to use and has been consistent and I assume accurate Read more