M. Meyer—December 2, 2023✓ Verified purchase
I wear gas permeable lenses, and had been ignoring the injunction against rinsing then with tap water. I have to admit they have been more comfortable since I started using saline solution. I'm not going through it as fast as I had feared I would, and being able to buy it in this quantity makes it more affordable. I recommend it for rinsing lenses and cases. Read more
Mark Miskiel—January 6, 2026✓ Verified purchase
Used this brand before and have had no complaints. Read more
Amanda Fallon—May 16, 2023✓ Verified purchase
And when I put my contacts in, I have to use this to rinse the storing solution off because that stuff burns my eyes. It feels great and does what it's supposed to do. Read more
Karen Dalen—October 18, 2022✓ Verified purchase
Great solution for storing your contact lenses. Gentle on the eyes as well. Read more
A. ADAMORE—July 14, 2023✓ Verified purchase
This product keeps my contacts moistened and helps me to rinse the contact lens cleaner off of my eyes. Read more
Linda Jones—July 21, 2023✓ Verified purchase
Soaking contact lens Read more
Jason Holman—September 22, 2021✓ Verified purchase
I have been looking for the Bausch and Lam sensitive eye solution after using it for years.l I was go glad to find it here, now I have a supple that will last me a few months! Read more
Waltham—March 31, 2022✓ Verified purchase
The product information is misleading at best and downright wrong in at least one aspect. The ad says 24- oz Per Box (Value Pack of 4) which sounds like 4 boxes i.e., 8 bottles. This is misleading. But if you calculate the price per ounce, the advertised price of $0.28/Fl. oz is for 8 bottles (8 bottles is 96 ounces therefore $26.52 / 96 oz. is $0.28/Fl. oz). This seems to validate four boxes with a total of 8 bottles. But I only received 2 boxes i.e., 4 bottles. The unit price for 4 bottles at the price of $26.52 is approximately $0.55/Fl. oz. This is not what the ad shows. The product is fine, and I have used it for years. This ad needs to be corrected. Read more