Ensign Chekov—February 16, 2019
The Derek Rose boxers were exactly as expected, and if it's like previous purchases, they will last a long time - so they're actually worth the extra money. Ordered two pair. Got two pair, too, but only one of them was Derek Rose. The other was Fruit of the Loom - stuffed into a Derek Rose box - the Fruit of the Loom label covered over by sticky tape (like the customer wouldn't notice - LOL). Not the first time something like this has happened, I suspect. The Fruit of the Looms? Returned, but apparently it could take months to get a replacement pair sent (according to AMZ). As a result, I contacted to Derek Rose in GB, ordered two pair for $2 more than the AMZ price, and they were here in two days. No fake ones, either. Buyer beware. Read more
Edmund Cape—September 14, 2018
For the price it delivers on the quality and fit... in the first 2 years. I have several pairs. Three of them started to tear in the same place (the front seam at the bottom of the front opening). I don't use bleach which can harm the garment in the long term. My Gap boxers lasted longer. Not good given I can get 3-4 Gap pairs for the same price as one Derek Rose pair. Finally, I contacted customer support over email. They were not at all impressed nor sympathetic to my concern. Surprising given what I would expect from a premium brand. Read more
Judy in the skies—December 21, 2017
These boxer shorts are not as soft as my husband would like. True they are 100% cotton, but cotton can be soft, and these have a stiffness to them even after many washings. Aside from that, my husband is happy with the style and the fit. He is a size small, ordered a size small, and they fit as they should. Read more
M. heidari—May 4, 2017
perfect Read more
Caveat Emptor—October 12, 2015
Please! These are cotton boxer shorts, and they are perfectly fine. Fortunately, I paid considerably less that the current $60 price tag, which I find challenging to justify when so many 100% cotton boxer shorts sell at well under $10. Any guy who fails to buy his undershorts on sale has too much money, and if his partner is shelling out that kind of money for such utterly unremarkable shorts, I predict the relationship doomed. The only possible exception one might imagine would be a functionary charged by the British royals to keep the princes' "pants" drawers topped off; since we already know that from the perfectly fossilized crypto-Nazi Prince Philip to Baby Prince George of Cambridge, those dudes are silly nose-pickers one and all--except possibly for Harry with his admirable gift for keeping himself entertained by the longest running Royal Soap Opera on the entire planet.. Read more
Darren F.—May 16, 2016
Much lighter fabric than I expected, but quality product, good fit. Read more
reza s hashemiha—August 18, 2015
not a bad product for the price; but has a little wide and short of a cut. Read more
BARRY1—September 12, 2016
very nice thanks barry Read more
