Jockey Womens Underwear Plus Size Classic Brief - 3 Pack

I've tried several of the so-called new varieties of women's panties only to discover that I needed to come back to my old choice which is so comfortable - soft, leg elastic covered nicely with good quality cotton, no non-breathable material , and the size is exactly what the size chart says it is! All those things are paramount to a good quality panty! The price is perfect and they arrived quickly (3 days). Thank you Jockey! Please don't ever change your style, 100% superb quality cotton material and on-target sizing. Read more

They fit well and are nice material. Have washed and they still fit well. I will be buying more of these. Read more

Jockey undergarments are a great product for men & espically woman. Tried other brands but nothing comes close to Jockey. Wonderful product. Read more

Comfortable cotton with nice elastic .. love it Read more

good material, good fit, i've actually ordered and returned at least 5 packages of different brand panties and these are the only ones that are actually full panties Read more

Fit was what my mom expected from a full-coverage cotton brief; legs are not high-cut. This one was a better fit for her than the Jockey Elance in the same size (not plus) which was a little snug in the waist (we got her regular size). The cloth is thinner than the Jockey Elance. Much better quality that the packs of underwear in Target/Walmart. Read more

This is my second order of Jockey classic brief ~ A short while ago I placed an order for a 3 pack of the Jockey Classic Brief & a 6 pack of another well known brand. The other brand charged less for their 6 pack than Jockey did for the 3 pack, but I wanted to see the differences. after wearing both brands I ordered more Jockey and disposed of the others. The material is softer to wear, I like the cut more even though the Jockeys are a 10 & the others are an 11. Also Jockeys elastic doesn't cut me in half. Always JOCKEY. Read more

size is correct. Cotten feels smooth and comfortable. Read more