Its wrong to mislead, even if you pretend its an error in translation.
Let me preface this by saying for $36. I was not expecting the blazer to look as rich as shown, so I understood i was taking a chance. But what i thought i bought, and what I really got are not the same. The description uses the word velvet no less than 7 times. I knew it was really a synthetic velvet by the poly fiber content, but the picture is showing a plush, lovely, rich velvet, like the synthetic velvet pink boots i placed against the actual jacket that was sent to me, there isnt a follicle of plush here. Sellers should be honest and show the actual product, and give the truthful description. This is a knit, microfiber synthetic suede, unlined. The microsuede-type backing is a thin soft knit animal print similar to a poly/cotton t-shirt blend fused to the pinkish exterior. The seams are simply overlocked. There are no hip pockets, just the flaps. Its not winter weight as even a synthetic velvet would be, but it is a nice spring/fall weight. For the price, a truthful picture & description would have been a fair way to treat clothing consumers with respect. The jacket is priced for the quality it is & Id have purchased it at this price as a boxy unlined microsuede blazer just for the cute color combo to wear casually with jeans, but the pictures & description are intended to lie about the quality, and more and more foreign sellers are abusing their customers with false claims & totally false photos looking nothing like the product we're ordering. Read more
