Average Joe—November 5, 2025
Strong trimmer. I have had this trimmer for over 2 years now and have used it weekly, about twice a week, during that entire time. The battery has only just started to not hold a charge for longer than 20 minutes. So, for $6.50 I purchased 2.4v 1100mAh AA Ni-Cd battery for a rechargeable exit sign (2.4V 1100mAh Battery Replacement for Exit Sign Emergency Light Exitronix 10010036 Lithonia 10010034 Interstate NIC1394 BEL-179), then disassembled the trimmer, desoldered and removed the old 600mAh battery pack, soldered in the new 1100 mAh batteries, cleaned the inside of the trimmer head, re-greased the the gear where the motor post meets the trimmer blade, and reassembled everything. The trimmer now cuts like new and has almost twice the energy capacity as when it was new. Keep the blades clean and oiled every so often, and this trimmer will continue to serve you well. Read more
R Haff—December 9, 2025
Hard to believe the cost on this Wahl... such an excellent value you could pay a LOT more for other brands and I would put this up against any one! At a fraction of the price you get quality and durability. My last one lasted over 10 years, and I finally replaced it because I figured for the price I may as well get a new one as the battery was starting to wear a bit. I'll never buy a different brand. Read more
Knudlen—December 9, 2025
Item came as expected. The nose trimmer is very light and feels pretty cheap, but I have not tried it yet. The clippers themselves have worked well but the guards, especially the adjustable beard guard, have 'loops' that protrude more than you'd expect. It's also not as hefty as you'd expect which can be good or bad depending on your preference. Maybe I just need to get used to it but it feels like if I don't go over an area at the exact right angle it pushes the blades further out very easily and forces me to go over spots that were not as short. This is obviously exacerbated when trimming facial hair as the contours are much trickier. Still good for the price. Read more
Larry Kirk—January 5, 2026
Works well, and happy 😊 Read more
Joe Arnold—January 4, 2026
Perfect for any person. I’ve had this model before and it lasted for years lol I actually still have the nose hair trimmer from the first one I had. I only bought this one because I needed the trimmer. Read more
erick hernandez—December 5, 2025
Feels very cheap but more or less gets the job Read more
Russell L. Ehrlich—November 29, 2025
This unit is a little large but works great and stays charged up a long time. I use a primarily to trim nose hair. Read more
Robin D—November 21, 2023
I've been very satisfied with the more expensive and stainless steel version of this trimmer that I've used for a few years now, until the plastic button on the unit disintegrated suddenly one day. Plastic will do that, I have discovered over the years: it is fine until suddenly it reaches an age where its structural integrity is suddenly lost and it literally crumbles to pieces. I've seen it happen with an old set of ski boots that crumbled to pieces when pulled out for the first time in a few years (that was something to behold!) I've experienced it with a pair of running shoes that I kept in the closet too long, the soles literally turning to powder as I took my first steps. I'm familiar with this phenomenon, but it always makes me a little angry when it happens. Especially when the rest of whatever the plastic thing is attached to is perfectly fine. Anyway, the old Wahl has a plastic switch and it crumbled. Faced with spending twenty vs eighty dollars to replace the old one, I went with this version as a trial. It's fine so far. The cutting head is narrower and the attachments from the other one don't fit this one, but it came with its own, so no big deal. I don't like the lightweight, cheap feel of it, but for a quarter to a third the price, I can live with it. The technical stats say the battery on this one loses its charge quicker, but I haven't noticed that yet. I still like the stainless steel version better. Thus the rating. Read more