Free shipping over $35 · 60-day returns · Price-watch guarantee

Ventari

POLO RALPH LAUREN

POLO RALPH LAUREN 5-Pack Classic Fit Woven Boxers

$69.50
size6

134+ bought in the past month

Key details

department
mens
date_first_available
June 10, 2020
manufacturer
Polo Ralph Lauren
best_sellers_rank
#27,707 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ( See Top 100 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ) #38 in Men's Boxer Shorts

Technical specifications

item_model_number
NCWBP5AOOG-960

Product videos

Product video 1

Customer reviews

1,177 reviewsPositive

Rated 4.5/5 across 1,177 reviews — highly regarded by customers.

  • 75% of sampled reviews give 4–5 stars.

Customers say

Customers find these boxers comfortable and well-fitting, with one noting they don't ride up.

Generated from the text of customer reviews

★★★★★

Good

Nice boxer fits perfectly recommend Read more

Novelete
★★★★★

Polo 5 pack classic boxers seem pretty good for the price.

These look pretty decent. Comfy after first wash. Will see how it goes but not much shrinkage. Almost ordered a size up so they could be cooked in dryer but I think these will be ok. Nice wide waistband which is what I was looking for. Polo gear is usually generous on the material. I don’t see you doing any better than these for 10 a pair. I wore Gap boxers for years but like a lot of brands the quality has gone down and it’s hard to find decent stuff that holds up. Read more

-c.
★★★★★

Boxer knockout!

Super comfortable and cool colors!! Read more

Latin Marco
★★★★

satisfied customer

nice boxers. look good. just one small complaint for me: I'm 6', 162, no gut. bought large. slightly big in the waist, but no big deal. Read more

john c.
★★★★★

Finicky husband approved!

My husband is an exclusive Polo Brand underwear guy. And these made me nervous because he’s very finicky about the elastic on the underwear, so he usually avoids the open elastic casing on the underwear. I bought these for him for Christmas, and he loves them. They’ve changed the elastic in the past decade so they’re much more comfortable, and now he’s throwing all his underwear away to buy more of these. So if your husband has been worried about the elastic quality the way my husband has, you can rest assured that they have upgraded the elastic in the past decade. Read more

Christina Fransen
★★★★★

Excellent quality

Definitely better quality than the usual brands like Hanes, Jockey, Fruit of the Loom. More expensive, but worth it in my opinion. Read more

Daniel Hirsch
★★★★★

Práctica la coleccion

Gran oferta muy buena marca y calidad Read more

ANTONINO SAENZ
★★★☆☆

Ralph Lauren has changed the construction and the materials of this product since I last bought it

I found this brand of boxer shorts a decade or more ago and found them to be superior to many others, mostly in comfort. So I was a loyal customer. They were pricier, yes, but I was willing to pay. They were made of a soft cotton and had more workmanship and pleating than others. They fit better. These that I just I received via Amazon/Zappos are inferior. There is no longer a button on the fly. Instead of being composed of the cotton material folded over and stitched at the waist, they have now added an elasticized band that is not as comfortable. There is less pleating and as a result they seem stiffer and do not adjust to the customer's body as well. The cotton, is not as soft as it used to be, thinner but rougher. What has happened to clothiers? The overall effect and impression is they are cutting costs. There is less workmanship, less tailoring and cutting corners to save money. They are sacrificing quality and comfort. I will not buy these again b/c they are no longer any different from other brands which are less expensive. In many ways, clothes are inferior to what they once were. It also reinforces my bias against buying clothes on line. I need to see, feel and touch them first. I'm not a fan of returning items to Amazon since they have not always acknowledged my returns either and this creates more work for me to convince them I returned the item and it was their error. Read more

Nelson T.
Recently Viewed

We use optional analytics cookies to understand how visitors use Ventari and improve the experience. This banner controls analytics measurement only. See our Cookie Policy.